Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Jennings
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Adam Jennings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable public figure, all references are either created by himself or IMDb which is unreliable. KingMorpheus (talk) 16:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 March 18. Snotbot t • c » 17:33, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Red Box New Media not to be confused with Redbox (http://www.redbox.com) ~dee(talk?) 08:00, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Probably a fine guy, but that doesn't make you notable. The lack of significant coverage by reliable third parties is the big issue, with the use of primary sources and self-promotional wording of the article in second place. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.